Strategic Approaches to Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPDM) in Protected Cultivation
Downloads
Protected cultivation systems, while optimizing crop yields, create unique microclimates that facilitate the rapid proliferation of specialized pests and pathogens. This article evaluates strategic approaches to Integrated Pest and Disease Management (IPDM) within greenhouse environments, shifting the paradigm from reactive chemical reliance to a proactive, ecologically based framework. The study analyzes the synergy between cultural practices, such as climate manipulation and sanitation, and the deployment of biological control agents, including predatory mites and microbial antagonists. Furthermore, the integration of modern technologies specifically AI-driven digital scouting and precision sensor monitoring is examined as a means to establish more accurate economic injury thresholds. A significant focus is placed on resistance management through the strategic rotation of bio-rational pesticides to ensure long-term efficacy. By synthesizing ecological principles with technological innovation, this approach aims to reduce synthetic residues, satisfy stringent food safety regulations, and enhance the overall sustainability of protected horticulture. The findings suggest that a multi-layered IPDM strategy not only safeguards crop integrity but also aligns greenhouse production with the increasing global demand for environmentally responsible agricultural practices.
[1] R. Albajes, M. L. Gullino, J. C. van Lenteren, and Y. Elad, Eds., Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
[2] J. S. Bale, J. C. van Lenteren, and F. Bigler, “Biological control and sustainable food production,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 363, no. 1492, pp. 761–776, 2008.
[3] R. A. Cloyd, “Greenhouse pest management,” in Encyclopedia of Pest Management. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2010.
[4] P. De Clercq, P. G. Mason, and D. Babendreier, “Benefits and risks of biological control,” Biological Control, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2011.
[5] Y. Elad and I. Pertot, “Climate change impacts on plant pathogens and plant diseases,” Journal of Crop Improvement, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99–139, 2014.
[6] M. L. Gullino, R. Albajes, and J. C. van Lenteren, Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops, 2nd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2020.
[7] E. Heuvelink, Ed., Tomatoes (Crop Production Science in Horticulture). Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing, 2018.
[8] R. M. Labbé and D. R. Gillespie, “Managing the greenhouse environment to control pests and diseases,” in Integrated Management of Diseases and Insect Pests of Tree Fruit. Cambridge, U.K.: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, 2020.
[9] G. J. Messelink et al., “Approaches to conserving natural enemies on greenhouse crops,” Biological Control, vol. 75, pp. 82–92, 2014.
[10] P. C. Nicot, Ed., Classical Biological Control of Greenhouse Pests. Wageningen, Netherlands: IOBC/WPRS, 2011.
[11] M. P. Parrella and T. Lewis, Thrips as Crop Pests. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing, 2017.
[12] L. J. Pilkington, G. Messelink, J. C. van Lenteren, and K. Le Mottee, “Global practice of biological control in protected culture,” Biological Control, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 216–220, 2010.
[13] W. J. Ravensberg, A Roadmap to the Successful Development and Commercialization of Microbial Pest Control Products for Control of Arthropods. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2011.
[14] J. C. van Lenteren, “The state of commercial biological control: An inventory and analysis of invasive species,” BioControl, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2012.
[15] Z. Q. Zhang, Mites of Greenhouses: Identification, Biology and Control. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing, 2003.
